Man Pleads Guilty to Harassing Child in Brentwood Home Depot
The Ladue man originally was charged with sexual misconduct involving a child. He will not be listed on the state's Sex Offender Registry, but will go through a probation program for sex offenders.
A Ladue man pleaded guilty Monday to harassing an 11-year-old child in a Home Depot restroom in Brentwood.
Christopher A. Frank, 42, of the 700 block of Cella Road in Ladue, pleaded guilty to harassment involving an adult harassing a child, a class D felony.
Frank received a suspended imposition of sentence, given 120 days of electronic home monitoring and was placed on five years probation.
Frank originally was charged with sexual misconduct involving a child under age 15, also a class D misdemeanor. He is owner and president of Cfx Inc., a marketing firm based in St. Louis.
Brentwood Police reported that Frank got on his knees in a restroom stall and exposed his genitals to an 11-year-old boy in the next stall Nov. 25. Police said Frank then lay on the floor and watched the boy use the restroom.
As part of the plea agreement, Frank will not be placed on Missouri’s Sex Offender Registry. However, he will go through probation as part of the sex offenders program, a St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office official said.
For more crime information Brentwood Patch, see the following articles:
Jane
2:17 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I find it disturbing that his lawyers and his money managed to get him left off the sex offender registry. Based upon what he did (to a child nonetheless) means that he is precisely that type of person who should be on the list.
Jennifer Horton
2:41 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I'm with Jane. There is something very wrong with this man and he should not be able to get away with this. I'm sure there was a plea agreement put into place so the poor boy he victimized would not have to go through any more.
What really scares me is that Mr. Frank is the father of two young girls. There is also the fact that his company also is also adjacent to a school. I guess a sick person such as Mr. Frank has to actually touch a child in order for something to really be done. This man is just lucky it was not my son he did this to. Because I would make sure he did not get to walk away with basically just Probation!
Linda S
2:44 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I agree with Jane ONE MILLION percent!
Disgusting that one can commit such a crime - ADMIT guilt even & only get a slap on the wrist for such perversion! That child is traumatized for life!
Shame on you, monster Frank, shame on you defense attorney AND the courts!
Katherine
2:49 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Shame on Brentwood!!! For letting this man and his lawyer get away with this! Who is the municipal judge that allowed this because he she should be fired!
Regular Guy
3:51 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
It is not the judge that makes these decisions...it's the prosecuting attorney.
Jane
3:00 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Seriously - the more I think about this, the more mad I get. How is it even possible that you can somehow avoid the list? Isn't the point of the sex offender registry so that the public can be made aware of a potential threat? So, let me get this straight. An 18 year old who has sex with his under age girlfriend gets on this list, but this dangerous man doesn't? Shame on you, Brentwood. It makes me want to google any man who has regular contact with my sons, but of course names can be changed. I don't want to be a paranoid parent, but reading something like this makes me think I need to be even more vigilant, since evidently the courts aren't looking out for our children.
Jennifer Horton
3:30 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
According to a previous artical Mr. Frank was charged by the county prosecutor. So this is all on the County Courts and not Brentwood.
Linda S
3:49 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
It was the decision of the St. Louis County courts.....
here's a prior article of 8/28/12 StLToday.com http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/police-boy-identified-man-who-exposed-himself-in-brentwood-store/article_92b922f6-f120-11e1-85da-001a4bcf6878.html
He's also up for a DWI charge from 07/2012 w/trial on 3/14/13.....
Mo Legal Case information: Public information available at https://www.courts.mo.gov/casenet/cases/searchDockets.do
You can search by name/litigant
CHERYL EMERY
4:36 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Brentwood is not responsible for this offender's punishment. The Judge and lawyers are to blame for this guy not being placed on the sex offender's list. You can bet this is not the first time he has done something like this, and unfortunately, it won't be the last.
T Hunter
4:47 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
will Ladue patch pick this up? his neighbors should know.
Doug Miner
5:30 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
T Hunter - Yes, it will run in Ladue Patch. Thanks
morgan roberts sr
9:04 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Can you please let me know why my 1st comment was pulled?
Colleen
5:41 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
There is no reason this man should NOT be on the sex offender list, it's sickening how money can buy your way out. What is the point of the registry if not everyone has to play by the same rules. Makes you wonder who you really are living by, whose homes your children are playing in, etc. if there is no trust in the system to keep our children safe. Agreed with Cheryl, it was definitely not his first time and with just a slap on the wrist, not his last. What is scary is if his children's friend's parents are aware or not, there should be no children under the same roof as him, including his own. He is a sick man who should face the same punishment as Joe Shmoe anywhere else in our area.
Esther Molina
6:21 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
No, this is not is first offense. He has been caught in parks and carries on his 'activity' at the Brentwood Y. I guess that's because LADUE doesn't have a Y.
Esther Molina
6:19 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
This is a very dangerous and sick man. I know a guy that saw him doing something very inappropriate with another MAN at the Brentwood Y in the heated spa. He reported it to the Y and to the police and both did nothing about it. When this story happened he called the police again and told them what happened. This man needs to be locked up behind bars. Shame on those who keep setting him free again and again. Sir if you are gay, then leave your wife and pursue who you are in private. Stop this activity of yours in public.
morgan roberts sr
7:56 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
I'd like to know why my comment got pulled? Is it because I asked for the judges name? Is it because I called out this monsters business? The system totally failed on this one folks so lets not hide that fact.
Bill Gault
9:57 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The slime trail from Ladue to Brentwood and back, and public parks, is well documented on this guy. If he were one of the 99%, he would be sitting in a jail cell. Will continue only serving time spending his wife's trust fund. What a fraud.
Jane
7:36 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
So, I did a google search for "Chris Frank" and "Christopher Frank" and the only story I can find about this in the past two days is in the Maplewood Brentwood Patch. No mention on the Ladue Patch, no mention in the Post Dispatch. What is going on? I read far more banal articles at the Post; yet, they won't cover a prominent sex offender in our midst. I call foul. I hope I'm wrong and they are just writing their articles as I write. But otherwise, the lesson to be learned from all this is that if you are from Ladue and have money, you can be just a perverted as you like and you can just make a call and have the paper overlook your criminal perversions.
T Hunter
8:26 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Search for cfx chris frank or chris frank st louis.
Since he owns an advertising agency there is plenty of information out there.
Jane
10:06 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
I know there is plenty information out there about his professional life. That's neither here nor there. My point is that the papers don't seem to be heavily covering his recent settlement in the courts and his criminal actions in the Home Depot. I find that disturbing considering what he did. Go to the Post's home page and do a search for Mr. Frank. You won't find anything recent. I find that very suspicious. It leads me to conclude his lawyer made a few calls or he has a friend at the paper.
Joseph
4:46 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Jane, you are right. Seems eerily suspicious that the "news" isn't reporting this monster. This is one of the biggest abortions of justice I have ever witnessed and it is unfathomable that there are no journalists in this town who are willing to pick up the scent of lies, big-money favors and pay-offs to expose this predator. This is a story about a conflicted man who is too much of a coward to admit what he is sexually so he acts out chemically and he acts out sexually. He has no real friends to speak of, only conquests and acquaintances that he believes will further his business or career. He treats those he can't use for personal gain with contempt and he clings to material things and money as if they are precious family members. Meanwhile his family is too busy enabling him to see his cries for help and his behavior continues to escalate until one day a child is harmed. It's time for his family and the legal system to stop bailing him out and let him wallow in his own self loathing. It's true, he escaped this latest run-in with police with just a slap-on-the-wrist, and for the sake of that 11-year old boy that is a tremendous tragedy, but take solace knowing Chris Frank hates himself and he will commit another offense. He's got five years of probation and I'm confident that he won't make it. I just hope that another child doesn't have to get hurt in order for the prosecuting attorney to get it right the next time…and there will be a next time.
Bart Karnowsk
11:32 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
This is crazy, I wrote stltoday.com about doing a story. I'm sick of people always thinking Saint Louis is dangerous but guess what? I'll take any street, any time in the city, rather than risk having a family in the same zip code as this drunk-driving, spoiled, perverted piece of shit.
Bill Simmons
2:37 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
I would be in jail awaiting trial of it would have been my son. I don't have time for courts to charge and try him just to let him off Scott free. He'd pay for his crime right then and there.
Ken Abate
2:42 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
This is more common in our legal system than most people realize. The judges and prosecutors are for sale and have a habit of giving each other a reach around so to speak.
MonsterFrank
4:10 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
I wonder if there are any surprise parties scheduled to celebrate his treachery?
MJ Stricklin
5:14 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Since the guy is in advertising, maybe an interstate billboard advertising his crime and his judgment should be placed along 64. This would cover Brentwood Ladue Clayton. Bet parents and! concerned citizens would contribute to the billboard. A little advertisement goes a long way
Carmelita Armstrong
5:18 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Hopefully , our legal system will get enough heat from the public to treat EVeryone the same.this is a TRAVESTY!!!!
Madeline
5:44 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
What a NUT CASE!! This man should have been put on a sex offender list! I hope we never have to read about this offender again~ Sadly I don't think that will be the case! Tis a sad sad world in which we live! SHAMEFUL!!!
Kristina
6:02 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
That is not right. He is a sex offender point blank period. I guarantee he will do something again, because he got away with it this time. Shameful is correct. U can become a sex offender if you are found guilty of urinating in public. Come on justice system.
Ken Abate
10:49 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Kristina, you are correct, the fact that our legal system has the ability to punish someone urinating in public as a sex offender should be an indicator to any clear thinking human as to how corrupt our legal system is in this country.
Jane
9:37 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Good news. The Post and KMOV both did stories on Frank. Perhaps those of you who wrote made a difference. Even if he managed to avoid getting on the sex offender list, he didn't avoid getting his mug shot plastered all over the local news. I just learned he was on the board of the Children's Hospital. Can you believe it? Yuck.
Loree Amsden
10:33 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Count me in for the Billboard fund. Sick sick! Inexcusable.
Margie N
10:53 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
I wonder how the school and their families down the street from his residence would feel if they knew they had a creep like that living so close. He so obviously has a major problem along with several other issues that need to be addressed, managed and should be monitored. His behavior is only going increase with time and obviously, he has a wide range of 'interests', a threat to society, even the 'high society' he so desperately wants to be a part of. And why is his "trust fund" wife still with him, he is obviously not interested in her - she needs to take the kids, her money and run, hell leave the money and save your children, he so obviously has no consideration of the damage on the young, innocent minds. HE NEEDS TO BE PUT ON THE LIST, he didn't get caught peeing at Mardi Gras, he showed his penis to a little boy and watched him go to the bathroom. That innocent child deserves more, that child will never be the same. This man will strike again, consenting adult male, or innocent child, he needs to be stopped!
Margie N
11:04 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Oh, and not to mention the girls school in Tower Grove his business is next door to. School officials, parents and neighbors have the right to be notified.
Rochelle Harris
11:20 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013
It's this sort if scenario that often leads to larger crimes! This is gonna be the story they bring up when he ends up kidnapping and sexual abusing such as in the case of Shawn hornbeck!
Mariah
12:03 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Yeah... so im assuming NONE of you know chris
personally, because if you did you would know that he
is a great man and father to his two girls. He's nota
"creep" nor "NUTCASE" hes a very kind and loving
man...and he has more class in his right pinky than you
could ever dream of having. Am i a supporter of child
molestation? Of.course not... but he didnt touch the kid
and truly no one but Chris and the boy and God knows
what happened. There are obviously many holes in this
case, so until you know all of the facts... i cant respect.your opinion. Sinners cant judge sinners... we are all sinners and
there is no greater sin. So unless a commenter on this
is God or sinless... you have no room to judge. Most
of.the rumors going around about Chris are stories
made.up by people who having nothing better to do
then talk about other people... oh and last but not
least... whoever reported Chris doing "inappropriate"
acts with another male, to the police is.ridiculous
because last.time i checked.. being gay is not illegal.if it
was heterosexual activity going on no one wouldve
reported it. Food for thought.
Jane
6:42 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Mariah - do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound? I know it must be hard to come to the truth about a friend, but attacking the public for seeing it more clearly than you do is counterproductive. Sorry, but it is the same type of nonsense that allowed priests in the Catholic Church to go on abusing boys for so long. He has more class in his right pinky than I could ever dream of having?? Oh, dear, Mariah. Classy people don't expose their private parts to boys in restrooms. It's just laughable that I have to state the obvious. Do you realize that the boy identified your classy friend in a line up? How do you explain that? This is no misunderstanding, this is abuse plain and simple. By defending an abuser like Chris, you are thereby maligning your own character. Think very carefully before you defend him in public anymore. You quote the Bible. I can too. Proverbs 4 - Do not set foot on the path of the wicked. I would avoid your so-called friend, lest you lose your reputation as well.
Do you have a young boy, Mariah? Would you let Chris spend time with him alone? If so, you are worse than a fool. And no one said being gale is illegal. But being a pedophile is. Food for thought, indeed.
Esther Molina
7:22 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Mariah, you poor dear. Clearly you are a friend or relative which is clouding your opinion. Being gay is not illegal, but having sex with children or in view of others in public IS illegal whether you are gay or straight. Read closely here now, my friend SAW with his own eyes Chris having sexual contact with another man in the spa at the Y. That is NOT made up. He was very upset by this as he is a young man. My point is, if Chris is gay which he clearly is, that is fine. But admit it and stop sneaking around and committing illegal acts. Have your sex in private like most people do, either gay or straight. That is all the public is asking. Until you confront who you are, you are going to continue this illegal activity in public. It needs to stop.
Get help!
Jane
7:36 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Esther - I think you are being too kind to a predator here and also conflating pedophilia and homosexuality. What Mr. Frank demonstrated at the Home Depot is not normal homosexual urges. Healthy gay men do not expose their genitals to children. It is an insult to other gay men to label him as such. He is a predator. And for those of you who might say, well, we don't really know what happened, like Jennifer said, HE PLEAD GUILTY! He is guilty of abusing a child. Full stop. Let's not forget that in these discussions of what he did or didn't do in a spa. I frankly don't care about that, even though it is inappropriate and illegal to engage in sex acts of any kind in public. But that is not the larger issue here. Exposing yourself to a minor and then watching him is truly a sign of a sick mind. If he had been put on the sex offender list, he would have to abide by certain rules and stay away from areas with children. That he doesn't have to is really the problem here.
Bill Kowalski
10:20 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Mariah, are we going to stick our heads in the sand here? The guy has been busted numerous times. And don't worry, if there is a God, that God will get his turn to deal with the guy. But while this guy is still alive and actively psychologically traumatizing children, he is under the authority of the police, not God. Actually if God would like to take over right now and rapture this jamoke out of here, He is certainly more than welcome to do so.
Jennifer Horton
7:01 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Mariah, there are many sick people in this world who are very charming. They can be kind hearted and have many, many good intentions. But they still can not help themselves and need help. And no being gay is does not make you sick or against the law. But doing crude sexual acts in public and around a child is! Chris Frank Pleaded Guilty! He is showing a patern of very dangerous behavior and people want to make sure there children are safe from Chris Frank and people like him. He is being judged by a group of his public peers, who fear for there children and being safe in there cummities. Again Chris Frank Pleaded GUILTY! So he admits he did something around that child he should not have. And you do not have to touch a child to harm them! You need to find better people to be around or find some help for your friend....
Esther Molina
7:23 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
.
Mr. Completely
7:55 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
I'd echo Bill Simmons earlier comment. I too would have given this creep a beat down if my son had been the kid in the mens room and I'd be out on bond waiting trial for felony assault. Anyone who knows about these types will tell you that left to themselves they never "get better" they just get sicker. Chemical castration seems to work. Some people only learn from pain.
Hey Creeper! Please close your business and move to another city for a fresh start, maybe get a job at Home Depot in Arkansas or China?
Bill Kowalski
10:22 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
I don't know that a jury would necessarily blame you for kicking his face in if you caught him flashing some poor innocent kid. Certainly he wouldn't want me on his jury.
Esther Molina
8:19 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
The problem is not whether he is a pedophile or a pervert. His problem is that he is gay and because he is married to a woman, he is acting out his fantasies so to speak inappropriately. I never tried to imply that gays are pedophiles. But gays that don't admit who they are carry out their needs in other ways and do things like expose themselves to children. He is clearly gay and clearly a pedophile. No list is going to change him or really keep anyone safe. SO he would no longer go anywhere children are allowed? Really? That would be just about anywhere and who actually monitors this behavior? THe girls at the girls school are safe. But if there were a boys school next door, that would be an entirely different matter.
Jane
9:17 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Usually it means that he or she cannot be within, say, 300 feet of a facility with children or a site that is intended for children's recreation. This would include the YMCA, city parks, schools (of course), and most likely pools. He or she could not attend a church that has a daycare facility attached. Unfortunately, the Home Depot is still within his purview. But I very much disagree that lists and such are useless. They make the public aware of a potential risk. I do think sex offender lists are abused, i.e. there are people on those lists who aren't necessarily a threat. The classic example is a young man who has consensual sex with his girlfriend. I very much feel bad for those people who live under a cloud of suspicion.
But this is a clear cut case of a sex offender. For him to be able to legally spend time at schools, parks, pools and such is a disgrace. And I think it is false to connect his behavior in the Home Depot with homosexuality. You are still doing it by insisting that his failure to admit his "true" identity somehow leads him to expose himself in a public restroom to an innocent child. But we can certainly agree to disagree.
Bill Kowalski
10:24 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
This is a case of money buying privilege, in this case, judicial leniency. He had a good lawyer and a deal of some sort was made. That's all. If this guy was a janitor, he'd be looking out between bars right now.
Esther Molina
9:46 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
Jane, I didn't mean that his 'problem' is that he is 'gay' but that he is denying that he is gay by living a lie with his wife. If that's okay with her than fine. SO be it. But when he is looking for contact with little 'boys' and having consenual sexual contact with another man in a Y spa - that means he is gay. I am simply asking that he do his thing in private like most people do, anyone who does these things to children or in public places is sick whether they are gay or straight. As the old saying goes, Get a room!
Mr. Completely
9:57 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
All you need to know about how twisted this creep is can be found by looking at a picture of his wife, she's a hottie!! Rather than having a roll in the hay with her he's rolling around on the floor of a nasty public bathroom at Home Depot looking at little boys. NEXT!
And to Mariah; your fantasy of some supreme being has nothing whatsoever to do with a grown man showing his wiener to a little boy in a public restroom, bet you bought the Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig story too Huh? NEXT! again....
Bill Kowalski
10:14 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013
This guy is a child molester. That's a genuine mental illness, and vastly different from being gay. The fact that he is also gay is interesting, as so many child molesters identify as heterosexuals attracted to children. As a point of distinction, child molesters including Mr. Frank should be locked up for life as they will continue to offend until they are physically prevented from doing so, and gays should be left alone to live their lives in private as they like, just like straight people do. And private does NOT mean the facilities of the family-friendly Brentwood Y.
Tejal
1:23 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013
This is enraging, I live right down the street from there. How is it that a sports fan can run across a field naked in front of thousands of fans and be charged as a sex offender, yet this perv exposes himself with the intent to prey on an innocent child and gets off from being charged and having to register as a sex offender? (no pun intended). If I had to guess, it probably has something to do with money/connections with the people higher up. What a sick situation. On the (kind of) bright side, his life is pretty much over unless he moves out of the country and changes his identity.
T Hunter
8:22 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Anyone else think it's weird that there are NO comments on the Ladue Patch article?
Esther Molina
10:30 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
Yes. TH. It is also very weird that it took three days to put it in the Ladue Patch. I subscribe to most of the area patches and most news is sent out as an alert in all the Patches. And this guy lives in LADUE!!!!!!!
phil
7:19 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
His company www.cfx-inc.com Shows many of his clients.