patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Maplewood Council Bans Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination

The council passed the bill Tuesday night, in spite of fears of council members, including the mayor, that the law could be taken advantage of.

 

Maplewood joined St. Louis City and five St. Louis County municipalities Tuesday night when the city council outlawed discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Richmond Heights, Clayton, University City, Creve Coeur and Olivette have passed similar laws.

The council gave a majority of yes votes to Bill 5877 in its first two readings on Sept. 11, but not without controversy.

Mayor James White and council members Karen Wood (Ward 1) and Fred Wolf (Ward 2) voted against the measure at the Sept. 11 meeting and Tuesday night.

“I fear unintended consequences from the law,” Wood said following the final vote. “Discriminating and being hateful to people, that is not who I am. I am afraid of this type of law, not because of the spirit of the law, I get that. It’s the unintended ramifications that I fear. That’s why I voted the way I did.”

White and Wolf both had no comment following the meeting, though at the Sept. 11 meeting White said the law could be taken advantage of.

Councilman Shawn Faulkinghham (Ward 3) said the council made a statement  that “we believe it’s important to protect people’s identities, no matter what they are.”

“This country was founded on personal freedoms and religious freedoms, and this is a step in the direction that makes sure people aren’t discriminated against for being who they are,” Faulkingham said.

“We have an extraordinarily diverse community, and it adds to protect that diversity,” he said.

In the public comments before the vote eight speakers spoke in favor of passing the bill and one spoke against it.

Related Topics: Maplewood City Council

Becca Christensen

1:10 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

As a Maplewood resident I'm disturbed that Mayor White would object to this law on such ridiculous and baseless grounds, which clearly are a front for his (conscious or not) homophobia.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nancy Miner

3:03 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012

I respectfully disagree with your assessment. While the analogies he used may seem far-fetched to you and I.... I would suspect he could tell tales of stranger things happening during his many years of experience as a law enforcement officer. Expressing concern about the effectiveness of an ordinance and to not open up unintended consequences does not equate to homophobia. Pretty big leap there.

Comment_arrow

Becca Christensen

10:03 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

Please, Nancy! As a rule, I try to maintain balanced and respectful, especially when posting online where a lot of social context is missing. But discrimination against people of different sexual orientation really raises my ire. Suggesting that people are going to get into changing rooms and peep at others because of this law is nothing but fear-mongering based on a lack of understanding. It is cowardly and wrong.

Comment_arrow

Becca Christensen

10:15 am on Friday, September 28, 2012

I've said this elsewhere, and I'll repeat it here: LGBTQ Rights are this generation's racism (which is not dead yet, either). It is up to everyone of us to stand up for the rights of people who are different than us. If you don't understand something, get educated.

Christine Nobbe

7:21 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

The 3 W's might be voted out of office.

Reply

Leave a comment