Save Woodside.

This is the first Save Woodside poster created by Joann Grein and myself in 2001.
This is the first Save Woodside poster created by Joann Grein and myself in 2001.
The recent vote by the City Council of Maplewood to destroy our oldest building is distressing to say the least.  The importance of Woodside to our community and the historic record of this country is undeniable.  It is not just a fairly typical old house.  It is on the National Register of Historic Places.

Documentary evidence suggests that Woodside was at least partly built by slaves.  The interest in African/American historic sites is fast rising in the United States.  The Smithsonian recently acquired and moved a slave cabin to their museum.  How many buildings still exist in the St. Louis area that were constructed by slaves?  Not many, I’m betting.

Many African/Americans have been denied a chance to know much about the history of their families by the practices of the folks who enslaved them.  Sites like Woodside may one day allow descendants of the builders to lay their own hands on the work of their grandfathers.

The argument that Woodside is collapsing and unsound is not true.  The interior was recently toured by Councilman Tim Dunn and others who report that it is dry and sound.  Plaster has fallen and surfaces have deteriorated which is true of any building that has not been used for awhile.  Many people have a hard time seeing past the cosmetic deterioration.  The structural repairs needed are not overwhelming.

Buildings in far worse shape are regularly brought back especially in areas like Soulard that have made a strong commitment to historic preservation.  Indeed it is that commitment that has made Soulard one of the most desirable and interesting places to live in our city.

Why is it necessary to destroy Woodside?  Couldn’t we do a better job of mothballing it?  Why not spend a bit to remove the deteriorated addition on the west end of the building, seal the chimneys and board up the windows.  No one likes boarded up windows, of course, but this is an exception.  It’s our oldest building.  It is the miraculous surviving home of one of our pioneer families.  If we lose it we’ll never get it back.  What is more valuable than something that is irreplaceable?

There is another option we have not looked into.  Models exist for saving historic buildings in the eastern states where municipalities have many.  They have worked out lease arrangements which allow talented individuals who otherwise could not afford the cost to work on the building in exchange for being able to live there.  I imagine there are some which would allow these restorers to eventually own the buildings they have restored.  This is certainly worth looking into.

What would Rome or Paris or any of the great cities be without their historic buildings?  This is one of our most important.  We have the chance to save it.  Let’s not let it disappear.


This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Ken Cohen August 24, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Doug, I agree with you about Woodside and would like to help save it. Ken Cohen kalanc@hotmail.com
miseeire August 25, 2013 at 09:52 AM
Can someone please tell me where this home is located? I'd like to see it in person. Many thanks.
Luke Havel August 25, 2013 at 09:52 AM
This is bad news. I saw some pictures of the deteriorating condition recently but it looked to me like they were mostly of the addition side. If the building is also for sale by the city, I don't know how anyone would know it driving by the property. There is the nice sign on the corner but most probably would see it and think its a historical marker rather than a for sale sign. Let me know what I can do to help Doug.
Luke Havel August 25, 2013 at 10:02 AM
It is located on the southeast corner of Folk and Bredell.
Ram Fan August 25, 2013 at 10:09 AM
We 'saved' this building from being purchased and torn down by Kingdom Hall for a new church. Since that time, I've seen no improvement only deterioration. Doug, you buy it and maintain it or let the city tear it down. It's way past time to get rid of this albatross.
Doug Houser August 25, 2013 at 11:29 PM
Well I disagree with your last statement, Ram Fan. I actually did try to buy it twice once from the longtime owner who sold it to the Witnesses (missed it by a week) and once from the Witnesses who declined my offer. Now my situation has changed. I'd still love to have it but my wife assures me that if I go for it again I'll be a bachelor before the ink is dry on the contract. If you'd like to talk to me about this, I'm happy to do it. You can get in touch with me at dkhouser@gmail.com.
Kris Siebert August 26, 2013 at 10:44 AM
Historic preservation in communities is VERY important. Maplewood needs to restore this property!
Doug Houser August 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM
Kris, thanks so much for your support.
Jane August 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM
I fundamentally object to the notion that only those who have the cash or inclination to restore a property are allowed to have an opinion about the issue. Ram fan's sentiment is brought up almost every time an historic building is up for demolition, as if the wealthy are the only ones who can express opinions and have a desire to shape the appearance of their community. This is bogus. I applaud Mr. Houser for attempting to preserve our community's history.
Doug Houser August 26, 2013 at 01:50 PM
Jane, I do so appreciate your taking the time to express your opinion. I also appreciate your thinking on the subject. I wish more of our local governments considered their historic properties as the assets that they truly are. The City of Maplewood has really gone to bat for Woodside in spite of this most recent vote. I want to write a bit more on this in an upcoming article.
Jane August 26, 2013 at 03:25 PM
Doug - I would very much like to know more about the steps in the past that the city has taken to save the property. Every time I drive by, I notice the older Woodside sign that implies some sort of past commercial and city collaboration to restore it. What happened? And do you have any sense of the reasons for the current council's about face? I especially don't understand the urgency, or is there perhaps a developer that they have not yet revealed, out of fear that the community will not like what is to come? The CBS morning show had an interesting piece just yesterday on the various reasons for historic preservation. And one thing they highlighted is that sometimes it is not even just a desire to keep what's there but a real fear of what will replace the old. This is a very valid fear. Regularly historic structures all over the city are torn down for parking lots, gas stations and even nothing but grass (shame on you SLU).
Doug Houser August 26, 2013 at 04:31 PM
Jane, I'm happy to talk at length about this project. Email me at dkhouser@gmail.com or call 314-647-2952
Jan R. August 26, 2013 at 08:39 PM
There was a committee formed to save the old Rock Hill church, maybe they learned something that would help everyone with saving Woodside.
Doug Houser August 26, 2013 at 10:43 PM
Much thanks for the suggestion, Jan. It's worth checking out.
Michelle Seymour August 27, 2013 at 01:39 PM
I agree, Doug, this house is part of our shared history and should be preserved. Once it's gone, it's lost forever (and parking lots can be built anywhere). The most desirable areas in any city are the neighborhoods where homes and buildings are restored, not torn down. We need to preserve our city, not turn it into another boring suburban neighborhood like so many other places in St. Louis where convenience was chosen over history and old world beauty.
Doug Houser August 27, 2013 at 02:57 PM
Well put, Michelle. Thank you very much for your input. Please let the mayor and members of the council know how you feel. Don't worry about Tim Dunn he's already on board and has been since the beginning of this project more than a decade ago.
Joshua Horn August 27, 2013 at 04:07 PM
Doug, I have created a petition to save Woodside. I also believe that this site has more significance than most of us realize. Please if you would go and sign it, and pass the word on. http://maplewood-brentwood.patch.com/groups/real-estate-rumblings-/p/petition-to-save-woodside
Paintwine November 05, 2013 at 11:22 AM
I lived here and was involved with the city and public and we achieved things by thinking out of the box. Woodside can only be saved by a community effort of citizens and local businesses. Form an executive committee of experts ASAP -- Doug Houser as Historian, an architect or contractor familiar with the structure, someone who understands the local government process such as a former council-person, an expert in branding and social media. Meet for one hour, stay on the agenda and brainstorm the following objective and concept-- "to delay demolition until a fundraising effort has achieved a financial goal by a certain date". Come up with a viable proposal to generate funds through a "crowdfunding" campaign such as "Kickstarter", as well as local events, and think of ways to get local businesses and citizens onboard as sponsors. Have an eventual goal for the use / ownership of the building but that's almost secondary to the point of saving the historic structure. Meet with the Community Development Director and pitch your plan, ask for their support in a delay of demolition. Get on the agenda and propose the plan to City Council and the Mayor, ask for a delay of demolition. A goal of six months would seem to be a reasonable amount of time to reach $300k. What I can warn you about is the fact that most citizens don't understand the financial workings of a city. Prior to the razing of a neighborhood for a commercial development, Maplewood was looking at bankruptcy. What happens then is that public services, such as trash pick-up, go away. Just like any business, the numbers have to be right and if there's no working capital it's due to close. Maplewood has excellent police and fire departments, a nice historic district; for such a small city it has been blessed with a lot of talented individuals, in government, business, and its citizens. If locals really want to save Woodside this is seemingly their last big chance. A demonstrative spirit is admirable but it's going to take more commitment than that. People will have to tear down some other walls and overlook the past and move forward in a positive effort in order to save this structure.
Doug Houser November 06, 2013 at 12:58 AM
Much thanks for this post. I believe you have sketched out a workable blueprint. There are others who would like to do just what you suggest. Of course, I'm willing to do my part. At present 11/5/13, Woodside is featured in the Save This Old House section of TOH magazine and on their website. We are all anxiously waiting to see what if any proposals will come from this exposure. If none come I think there are those in the community ready to move in the direction you have indicated. Thanks.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »