.

Brentwood Public Works Considers Moving City Hall to Rec Center; Watch for New Survey

Some new ideas came up, including moving city hall functions and the library to the rec center, and moving the police department back to the old City Hall.

If you’re a resident, hopefully sooner rather than later, expect a concise survey on your opinions for a new recreation center.

That was the result of the Brentwood public works committee’s discussion on Aug. 8.

Committee chair Keith Robertson laid out the known facts, then added the possibility of including city hall functions into the new rec center, including the library.

“Accounting sense, it doesn’t make sense to have city hall any longer, where it is and the way it functions now,” he said.

Maureen Saunders said she’d like to go back to the residents with a survey. She said the gym and the pool would be cost-prohibitive. She said she’d like to see a rec center for teens.

“Alderman Kramer has been championing a gym. What sort of gym? Is a gym cost-prohibitive?” she said. “We need more cost analysis and a little bit more information as to what the residents want.”

She said she’s been in email contact with her constituents, who tell her they’d like to see a town center incorporated. She added that the is packed on the weekends and that there should be more areas to sit out and have coffee.

City Administrator Bola Akande said if the committee feels that the historical value of the old city hall doesn’t equate the cost of renovating, then it possibly makes sense to go forward with the town center concept.

City hall staff and the library would be moved across the street to a new community center and the old city hall would be sold.

Saunders then suggested that residents would like to see the police department move back to its former location in the city hall building, and sell the newer building it’s now in.

“I’m seeing more café for the town hall center, not facilities,” she said. “Keep the administrative offices and the library here, so both sides of Brentwood have kind of a town hall center.”

Akande said moving the police department back would be financially irresponsible, and Leahy said it would be possible but not practical.

Cindy Manestar said in her ideal world the old city hall building would be the police department.

“After the terrible incident in Kirkwood, people were panicking, saying why are we moving the police department? Here, it’s in the middle of Brentwood, now it’s back in Hanley Industrial Court,” she said.

She said the fire department, the police department, and all the other facilities would be where the rec center is. She said she likes the idea of a teen area and a courtyard for coffee.

At that point Andy Leahy said the old survey is reasonable but dated. He suggested sending a 3-question post card to residents.

“Do the residents really want us to keep the skating rink, yes or no. Do the residents want to add a fitness center to the rec center, yes or no. Should the city look at combining the rec center and the city hall into one building, yes or no,” he said.

When the committee started getting into the details, and realizing it wasn’t so simple, Akande suggested they go out for an RFP and select a consultant to develop questions for the committee to approve.

When Robertson said an RFP wasn’t needed, Akande said she knew of a company that could do the job for a reasonable cost.

The committee agreed that Akande would hire professional services to conduct another survey, and after city staff has met with the company it would come back to the committee with suggestions for questions.

The hope is that questions will be OK’d by the full board of aldermen, then the public works committee can get the surveys out to residents.

 

An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Maureen Saunders said a gym and the pool may not be cost-prohibitive. She actually said a gym and pool would be cost-prohibitive. The article has been changed to reflect that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maureen Saunders August 14, 2012 at 01:40 PM
Hi Doug, I have championed for a new survey since I got on the Board. I think you have a typo. You wrote:"Maureen Saunders said she’d like to go back to the residents and say the gym and the pool may not be cost-prohibitive". I stated that although the results of the first survey showed the residents wanted a full gym/ workout facility and pool it is cost prohibitive because of the competition from the Heights and YMCA. Since May I have stated we should go back to the residents and see if they want the rink and see what othe items they would like now that we have some very preliminary costs. Also, this is why I want verbatim minutes. I have often been quoted wrong by the city and recently by the Patch in the Food Truck article and now this one. I appreciate your service but it would helpful to verify the statements. Maureen Saunders
Doug Miner August 14, 2012 at 01:50 PM
Thanks, Alderwoman Saunders. I don't have the space to quote every speaker verbatim in full comments, so I have to choose, and paraphrase. Also I thought it was more important to state what the outcome of the meeting was, than to mention the full discussion, or what members had wanted to do in the past.
Maureen Saunders August 14, 2012 at 02:49 PM
Hi Doug, I did not want the PATCH to print verbatim that would make for some long and tedious reading. I just want the city minutes to be verbatim because one misplaced word can completely change a person's statement or intent and that is the official record. Please print a retraction regarding the following statement you printed in this article :"Maureen Saunders said she’d like to go back to the residents and say the gym and the pool may not be cost-prohibitive". I stated it was cost prohibitive. Thank you, Maureen Saunders
Doug Miner August 14, 2012 at 03:15 PM
Maureen, I made the change to state correctly what you said and noted the revision at the bottom of the article. Sorry for the mistake.
TOOWARM August 14, 2012 at 04:45 PM
Nine ring circus... guess who the nine are..... No matter what happens this is going to cost us plenty......
Thomas Gibson August 14, 2012 at 06:08 PM
You know it TOOWARM. They spend our money like it is they're own. To bad we just can;t fire them all right now. You know, I used to believe in them, no longer. Maureen is the only good one that I see. Wish she was my alderman but I am stuck with Leahy and robertson.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something